By CCN: Konstantin Ignatov, the CEO of the multi-billion-dollar “crypto” Ponzi scheme OneCoin, has pleaded not guilty to wire fraud. According to court documents, Ignatov entered the plea during a May 28 preliminary hearing via conference call.
As CCN reported, Ignatov — a Bulgarian national — and his sister Ruja Ignatova was charged with wire fraud, securities fraud, and money laundering related to the sham cryptocurrency, OneCoin.
The U.S. Department of Justice indicted Ignatov for scamming investors through a multi-national Ponzi scheme that made false promises of “guaranteed” profits.
Grifting Brother-Sister Con Artists
Shockingly, OneCoin Ltd. never launched an actual cryptocurrency. Instead, it used a proprietary SQL database to log transactions within the “OneCoin network.”
The FBI arrested Konstantin Ignatov on March 6 at the Los Angeles International Airport as he was attempting to flee to his native Bulgaria. That same day, Konstantin posted a smug Facebook photo from the Hollywood Hills. It’s unclear if the selfie was posted before or after his arrest.
Ironically, the con artist who stole billions of dollars from unwitting investors had the audacity to whine that someone had stolen his phone and suitcase.
OneCoin Revenues Topped $3.8 Billion
OneCoin Ltd., which is based in Sofia, Bulgaria, was co-founded in 2014 by Konstantin Ignatov and his older sister Ruja Ignatova.
Ruja served as CEO until she abruptly went into hiding in October 2017. Shortly afterward, Konstantin took over as CEO.
OneCoin was a typical Ponzi scheme. It operated as a multi-level network through which members received commissions for recruiting others to purchase bogus cryptocurrencies.
OneCoin Pretended to Be a Crypto Company
According to the Department of Justice, OneCoin generated a stunning $3.8 billion in sales between 2014 and 2016. During that time, the Ignatov siblings robbed scores of gullible investors out of billions of dollars.
“These defendants created a multi-billion-dollar cryptocurrency company based completely on lies and deceit. They promised big returns and minimal risk. But, as alleged, this business was a pyramid scheme based on smoke and mirrors.”
Basically, OneCoin pretended to be a crypto company to take advantage of the hype the nascent industry had started to generate in 2014. In reality, it had very little to do with actual cryptocurrencies.
“This is an old scam with a virtual twist. The cryptocurrency OneCoin was established for the sole purpose of defrauding investors. Ignatov and Ignatova allegedly convinced victims to invest in OneCoin based on complete lies about the virtual currency.”
Swindlers Hijacking the ‘Crypto’ Name
Moreover, the Justice Department pointed out that unlike authentic cryptocurrencies, OneCoin had no value, and there were no records of transaction histories involving the bogus currency.
“It offered investors no method of tracing their money, and it could not be used to purchase anything. In fact, the only ones who stood to benefit from its existence were its founders and co-conspirators.”
While it might be easy to dismiss the OneCoin debacle as yet another crypto scam, the fact is, con artists have increasingly started to hijack cryptocurrencies to operate criminal activities. Often, many of these “cryptocurrency” companies have nothing to do with crypto.
Many ‘Crypto’ Scams Have Nothing to Do With Crypto
One recent example is Longfin Corp., a bogus Nasdaq-listed fintech company that pivoted to “crypto” during the bitcoin bull market. The transition caused the company’s stock to spike 2,600% amid the bitcoin boom.
In reality, the company had nothing to do with crypto, as CCN reported. According to the indictment:
“Longfin did not engage in any revenue-producing cryptocurrency transactions, and did not use ‘blockchain’ to empower any solutions at all.”
However, Longfin and OneCoin are being spotlighted by the media as “proof” that the entire virtual currency industry is teeming with scam artists. To be sure, there are con artists in the ecosystem — just like there are in other industries.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in the article are solely those of the author and do not represent those of, nor should they be attributed to, CCN Markets.